The Fall of Assad: Syria’s Turning Point and the Path Ahead

cc Flickr Maureen, modified, https://flickr.com/photos/amerune/174613514/in/photolist-gqWvQ-kTLKk-nvDUzj-bxwD8K-2n8JdD8-2heti6h-y7rBzq-cL1zPG-xsbuqg-2n9V2jz-xs3u89-bT3ofB-y7ye3B-y7sZHu-xs3xVu-2naeSa5-y7rWTq-y7ycGv-xsbiB2-y7ruSY-xsbp4V-5iAiz-y7xTgT-b7Ea5R-xs3nwJ-xs3inS-xsbgJV-yp4ReB-y7sYSG-xsbjcv-y7y6DD-ymKj37-7hiNXy-xsbo3X-y7rSHS-xsb8h4-yp4TkR-ypMj4H-ymKjsW-ypMhWc-ymKc3A-ypMaCK-yp4TQi-y7sJcu-yxSdnj-26ejpnK-Q9CkAp-yp4WzB-ypMhDZ-y7sZVJ

The collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s regime represents a watershed moment in Middle Eastern politics. The rapid unraveling of the Assad government, a fixture in Syrian and regional affairs for over 50 years, was unthinkable for many, yet it materialized in less than two weeks as rebel forces swept across the country. This seismic event not only reshapes Syria’s internal dynamics but also sets the stage for a new phase of regional geopolitics.

The nuances of Assad’s fall, the rise of rebel coalitions, and the complex interplay of domestic and global actors merit closer examination to understand the challenges and possibilities in Syria’s post-Assad era.

 

Why the Assad Regime Collapsed

Bashar al-Assad’s government had long relied on a blend of repression, foreign support, and elite patronage to maintain power. However, by 2024, the cracks in this foundation had widened irreparably. Several key factors contributed to the regime’s collapse:

 

Economic Decay. Years of international sanctions, widespread corruption, loss of access to its oil-rich regions, and the extensive destruction caused by the civil war have devastated Syria’s economy. Essential infrastructure, industries, and public services were in shambles. The financial strain was keenly felt within the military, as soldiers were underpaid and poorly equipped. This economic deterioration sapped morale among Assad’s supporters and eroded the cohesion of the Syrian Arab Army (SAA).

 

Erosion of Military Cohesion. The SAA, already weakened by years of attrition and defections, disintegrated in the face of the rebel offensive. Soldiers abandoned posts, surrendered en masse, or fled the country. Videos of mass desertions underscored how far the regime’s once-formidable military had fallen. Assad increasingly relied on militias and local power brokers to sustain his grip on power. However, these fragmented and poorly organized forces, marked by a lack of cohesion, training, and discipline, proved to be highly unstable. This instability became evident in their rapid collapse, leading to the loss of key urban centers such as Aleppo and Homs—a critical logistical hub. The fall of these cities dealt a decisive blow to Assad’s regime, severing its access to coastal strongholds and disrupting Iran’s strategic land corridor to Hezbollah in Lebanon. As a result, the regime’s capacity to mount a credible defense was effectively crippled.

 

Over-Reliance on Foreign Backers. Assad’s survival through much of the civil war was largely due to the intervention of allies like Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah. Russian airpower and Iranian militias helped Assad reclaim territory, but this reliance on foreign forces exposed the regime’s fundamental weakness. By 2024, both Russia and Iran faced their own internal and external pressures—Russia with the Ukraine war and Iran with ongoing regional tensions—leaving them unable to prop up Assad as they had in the past. Russia’s limited airstrikes and naval launches from Tartus appeared more symbolic than strategic, while on Friday, Iran began evacuating its military commanders and personnel from Syria.

 

Rising Rebel Strength. The offensive that brought down Assad was spearheaded by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a group with roots in al-Qaeda that has transformed into a leading force within Syria’s opposition. HTS’s robust institutional framework, sophisticated tactics, and ability to coordinate with other factions—particularly the southern-based Free Syrian Army (FSA) groups—were instrumental in enabling the rebels to exploit the regime’s weaknesses. While this collaboration may have partly resulted from the FSA leveraging HTS-led advancements, rather than a formal alliance, it significantly enhanced the rebels’ overall effectiveness. Moreover, although Ankara has not openly acknowledged its involvement, its influence is undeniable. The synergy between Turkish-backed Sunni militias and HTS underscores a shared alignment with Turkey’s broader strategic objectives.

 

The Role of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham

HTS emerged as the pivotal force behind the campaign that brought an end to Assad’s rule. Notorious for its ties to al-Qaeda, the group has undergone a significant transformation in recent years under the leadership of Abu Mohammad al-Jolani. Understanding the group’s evolution and strategy is crucial to grasping the current dynamics in Syria.

 

From Jihadist Roots to Political Pragmatism. HTS was born out of al-Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate, Jabhat al-Nusra. Over time, Jolani distanced the group from its jihadist origins, emphasizing a nationalist agenda and seeking to portray HTS as a credible alternative to Assad’s regime. The group projects an image of pragmatism and moderation, at least in comparison to other Islamist factions. Central to this rebranding effort are measures aimed at safeguarding minority rights, curbing indiscriminate violence, and establishing governance structures in areas under its control. Despite these overtures, skepticism about the group’s true intentions remains pervasive.

 

Institutional Strength. HTS’s ability to plan and execute a nationwide campaign stems from years of institution-building. The group created a military academy, which trained a cadre of elite fighters, and established a civil governance body known as the “Salvation Government.” Under the protection of Turkey, the group established Idlib as a de facto Islamist state, complete with functioning governance structures, military discipline, and a degree of strategic autonomy. These structures allowed HTS to administer territory effectively and present itself as a disciplined force capable of maintaining order and projecting power.

 

Military Tactics. The offensive underscored HTS’s adaptability and sophistication. The use of drone warfare, infiltration tactics, and blitzkrieg-like territorial advances overwhelmed the regime’s defenses. By coordinating with other rebel groups and exploiting the SAA’s weaknesses, HTS was able to achieve its objectives with minimal civilian casualties—a stark contrast to earlier, more destructive phases of the civil war.

 

The Geopolitical Fallout

The collapse of Assad’s regime has reshaped the regional landscape, with significant implications for key stakeholders:

 

Russia. For Russia, Syria was a strategic linchpin in the Middle East, providing access to the Mediterranean via its naval base in Tartus. Moscow’s military intervention in 2015 helped Assad turn the tide of the civil war, but its failure to prevent his downfall damages Russia’s credibility as a power broker. The loss of Syria as an ally complicates Russia’s regional ambitions and raises questions about the future of its military presence in the country.

 

Iran. Iran invested heavily in Assad’s survival, viewing Syria as a critical link in its “Axis of Resistance” connecting Tehran to Hezbollah in Lebanon. HTS’s Sunni Islamist ideology and hostility toward Iran’s Shia proxies spell trouble for Tehran’s regional strategy. Cutting off supply lines to Hezbollah significantly undermines the group’s capacity to pose a threat to Israel, thereby reducing Iran’s influence and further eroding its deterrence strategy.

 

Turkey. Turkey has long supported Syrian opposition groups, including HTS, as part of its strategy to counter Kurdish forces in northeastern Syria. With Assad out of the picture, Ankara stands to gain leverage in shaping Syria’s future. However, Turkey’s priorities—particularly its opposition to Kurdish autonomy—could bring it into conflict with other actors, including the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which have also made gains in recent days.

 

Israel. While Assad’s fall weakens the Iran-Hezbollah axis, the rise of Sunni Islamist groups near Israel’s border in the Golan Heights presents new challenges. Rebel leaders have made overtures for peaceful relations with Israel, but the long-term dynamics remain uncertain. Israel will need to balance its interests carefully as Syria’s political landscape evolves.

 

The United States. The United States has reduced its direct involvement in Syria, refocusing its efforts on counterterrorism, leveraging a strategic partnership with Israel to constrain Iran’s activities, and safeguarding vital oil-producing regions. With Assad’s departure, Washington faces a dilemma: how to address the rise of HTS while ensuring stability in northeastern Syria. The United States’ reluctance to re-engage deeply could leave a vacuum for other powers to fill, namely Turkey.

 

Challenges of Transition

The fall of Assad does not guarantee a peaceful or stable future for Syria. The country’s fragmented opposition, enduring grievances, and devastated infrastructure pose significant obstacles to rebuilding.

 

Fragmented Factions. Syria’s opposition is far from unified. HTS dominates the north, the SDF controls the northeast, and FSA factions hold sway in the south. These groups have differing ideologies and territorial interests, making consensus on a national government elusive.

 

Reconstruction. Syria’s infrastructure has been decimated by years of war, leaving the country with a monumental task of rebuilding that is expected to take decades and cost billions of dollars. The involvement of international donors will be critical to this effort; however, ongoing political instability poses a significant challenge that could deter much-needed investment. In this volatile landscape, Gulf Arab states are likely to step up their involvement in Syria, aiming to uphold a semblance of stability and curb potential spillover effects—especially as the influence of Iran and Russia begins to diminish.

 

Extremism. The Islamic State is reemerging in eastern Syria, poised to exploit the chaos and the power vacuum created by the SAA’s retreat. Its expanding foothold poses a significant and enduring security threat to any prospective post-Assad order. Ensuring security and preventing a resurgence of terrorism will be key to stabilizing Syria. Any prolonged instability will provide fertile ground for ISIS to rebuild its networks and reclaim territory.

Back to Top

Login

Lost your password?