In a few words, THESE TREATIES ARE A FORM OF LEGAL BINDING OUR DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED AUTHORITIES, TO THE WHIMS OF CORPORATIONS, forcing any attempts by our politicians to govern as true representatives of their people, to fail in favor of the Corporate new UNELECTED Masters..

Anyone who doesn’t see this fatal flaw to support our true democracy, IS BLIND.

Re; The European Union – Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)
and The W.A.D. Accord & Its Compensation.

What the TREATY of VERSAILLES was to the 20th century PALES in COMPARISON to the TPP, CETA, C-CIT, NAFTA, et al, in the 21st.

CHANCELLOR Merkel;

In the matter of the C.E.T.A. and The W.A.D. Accord (THE ACCORD), as corporate Germany, and/or, the Government of Germany may be in the process of being:

1) misled,
2) misinformed,
and/or,
3) deliberately deprived of relevant due diligence information, et al, by corporate Canada,

and/or, the Government of Canada

regarding:

1) the risks,
2) the liabilities,
3) the responsibilities
and
4) et al,

that corporate Canada, and/or, the Government of Canada may be attempting to:

1) avoid paying,
or,
2) dilute the amount of,
and/or,
3) etc.,

of its/their contribution(s) to The Compensation that is embodied in THE ACCORD (aka; “The Australian Question”) by way of the design, the development and the

ratification of THE AGREEMENT and its Tribunals(s),

and,
as the attempts at the aforementioned “avoiding”, and/or, the “diluting” may be construed as acts

of guilt of, but, not limited to:

1) corporate Canada,
2) the Government of Canada,
3) the other signatories to THE AGREEMENT,
4) THE ASSOCIATES
and
5) et al,

raises the due diligence questions regarding the charges against:

1) corporate Canada,
and/or,
2)the Government of Canada,

for deliberately failing to provide (the) due diligence information to its (THE) ASSOCIATES

page 1 of 3

and

2) raises the due diligence questions regarding the MUTUAL charges against all of THE ASSOCIATES to THE AGREEMENT, for deliberately failing to provide (the) due diligence information regarding THE ACCORD and The Compensation to THE SHAREHOLDERS, and/or, THE POTENTIAL SHAREHOLDERS,

and thereby,

THE SIGNATORIES to THE AGREEMENT and THE ASSOCIATES are in the process of creating and developing an ENTERPRISE for purposes, but, not limited to:

A) defrauding,
B) manipulating the value of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs), stocks, and/or, other financial instruments that may be a product of THE ENTERPRISE and its subsequent ventures,
C) insider trading
D) racketeering
and
E) et al,

and,

as a consequence of the creation and the development of the new, secret and superseding jurisdiction by THE ASSOCIATES, and, thus, the creation of the “de facto”

jurisdiction, and the creation of THE TRIBUNAL(s) in order to:

1) PROTECT:
A) THE ASSOCIATES,
B) the Government Signatories to THE AGREEMENT,
C) the proceeds of the alleged criminal ENTERPRISE
and
D) et al,
by preventing:

A) investigations,
B) evidence and testimony,
C) findings, decisions, determinations, and/or, conclusions
and
D) et al,

from being:

A) conducted,
and/or,
B) disclosed, and/or, made public,

and thereby, render any, and all, judgements, and findings by the courts of lesser, and/or,

“non” jurisdictions against:

A) THE ASSOCIATES, and/or, their representatives,
B) THE ENTERPRISE,
C) the subsequent, and/or, associated ventures, et al,
and
D) the Government Signatories to THE AGREEMENT,

to be; moot, null, void, and/or, without merit,

and thus,
render any actions against the aforementioned ASSOCIATES, et al, unenforceable
and,
provide the basis for “net” counter-suits against THE NON SHAREHOLDERS by way of the Governments of THE NON SHAREHOLDERS, that is to say the Government of Canada, et al,

page 2 of 3 and

2) SECRETLY ADJUDICATE, determine and enforce “net” decisions against THE NON SHAREHOLDERS
and the lesser provincial/state and municipal governments via the agreeable SIGNATORY Governments (that is to say; The Government of Canada, et al) by way of:

A) punitive; fines, penalties, and/or, damages,
B) trade sanctions
and
C) et al,

for depriving THE ASSOCIATES of the profits that could be derived as a consequence of the unimpeded, and/or, unencumbered development of the ventures of THE ASSOCIATES and THE ENTERPRISE,

and, as a consequence of the aforementioned actions, and others,

I am compelled to inform you of this notification.

Other charges that have been raised against:
1) THE ASSOCIATES, and/or, their representatives,
2) THE ENTERPRISE,
3) the subsequent, and/or, associated ventures, et al,
4) the Government Signatories to THE AGREEMENT
and

5) et al,
are:

1) deliberate ignorance,
2) malicious intent,
3) depraved indifference,
4) reckless endangerment
and
5) et al.

In conclusion, as the Government of Germany has publicly acknowledged its concern about the “Investor-State Dispute Settlement” (I.S.D.S.) in THE AGREEMENT, I would ask you, Frau Bundaskanzarin Merkel, if you might be amenable to discussing the merits of enjoining in a suit against:

1) corporate Canada,
2) the Government of Canada
and
3) et al?

Sincerely,

David E.H. Smith
– Researcher
– “Qui tam…”

page 3 of 3
******
For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics by way of the C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, TPP, et al, and The WAD Accord
&
List of RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS.
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com

TPP, CETA, C-CIT SHAREHOLDERS & NON Shareholders AWAIT SUPREME COURT of CANADA’S, et al, FINDINGS, et al, to PROCEED. FINDINGS OF HIGHEST COURTS of EU NATIONS DIFFER FROM CANADA’S, et al?

It will be good for, not only the NON shareholders of the enterprises that will be generated by the on-going global “cooperation” of corporate treaties, agreements, partnerships, et al, including the China – Canada Investment Treaty, The Trans Pacific Partnership, the EU – Canada CETA,
but,
for the potential shareholders, as well,
who are quite interested to know if President Xi Jinping (China) will support Russia as a co-member of B.R.I.C.S. when President Putin uses his potential role as “The White Knight”.

And, while President Putin’s potential support as “The WHITE KNIGHT” in the development of the CETAgreement, et al, litigation below can dramatically off-set the hundreds of billions of dollars due to the present & future sanctions leveled by American led, et al, corporations & financial institutions via their governments’ signing their global corporate economic treaties/”arrangements”,
and the potential for making trillions of dollars for the Russian economy over the next 30 – 40 years & beyond,
are the citizens (SHAREHOLDERS & NON shareholders) of Germany & JAPAN just being prudent in wanting to wait for the outcome of:

1) the submission to The SUPREME COURT of CANADA & the highest court in Germany, et al, to make their findings regarding “The Submission”:

“The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of AMERICA, et al
v
the harmless Canadian NON shareholders, et al”?

and

2) “The MERKEL (Chanc. Germ.) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued”?
(see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com )

Have the federal representatives of the nations that are the potential signatories of CETA, TPP, et al, willingly provided the NON shareholders of China, Canada, Europe, the Trans Pacific nations, et al, with the aforementioned information? Are the federal representatives, et al, depriving the NON shareholders of Canada, et al, of the due diligence information that enables the family of the NON shareholders of Canada, et al, to make informed decisions regarding their financial planning?

And, would a reasonable person conclude by a preponderance of the evidence, &/or, beyond a reasonable doubt, that these documents, et al, demonstrate that the SHAREHOLDERS of AMERICA, CANADA , the EU & Trans Pacific nations, et al, really do not care which NON shareholders pay them the punitive penalties, etc., by way of their secret (“Death-Star Chamber”) TRIBUNALS, as long as its not the SHAREHOLDERS who pay & not their corporations regardless of which country the corporations:

1) operating from,
2) maintain their headquarters,
3) use to do their cyber banking, accounting, “taxation”, etc.
&
4) et al?

And, re; the CHINA – Canada Investment Treaty, is it understandable why the “coveted” Hong Kong investor & his associates are “concerned” with the aforementioned findings of The SUPREME COURT of CANADA, et al, & the effects of the findings, et al, on the EU, AMERICA, the Trans Pacific nations, et al, treaties with CHINA, et al?

In regard to arms sales; how about the sale of arms (non nuclear) in general in regard to the “trade” treaties that are continuing to be secretly negotiated and how will the Tribunals, both; B.R.I.C.S. & non BRICS, adjudicate, decide & penalize the NON SHAREHOLDERS for the sale of legitimate, semi- legitimate & “illegal” sales of arms within the signatories nations & the those of others, &/or, unaligned? Of particular, interest is China, which does have an treaty with Canada, which puts China “at odds” with other arms manufacturing & nuclear powers that it (China) does not have any “arrangements” with.

Are these types of questions that your politicians & the corporate lobbyists calls “forget-me-nots” (“Buyer Beware”) that will be (maybe) worked out after the fast tracked signatures are obtained?

And, what do you think is the significance of the line in The Submission to The Supreme Court of Canada “…And, lest one forgets that the revelation of the present perilous international treaties/”arrangements” began with the regard for the rights of Native Canadians as per the Treaties/”arrangements” that corporate Canada & the Government of Canada have “foisted” upon Native Canadians…”? What are the various ways that this line will cost the SHAREHOLDERS, et al?

On the other hand, it may be worth repeating,

“What the TREATY of VERSAILLES was to the 20th century (WWII) PALES in COMPARISON to the TPP, CETA, C-CIT, NAFTA, et al, in the 21st”.

And, how will YOUR submission to YOUR highest court IMPROVE upon The Submission that is presently before The Supreme Court of Canada?

David E.H. Smith
– Researcher
– “Qui tam…”
******
For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics by way of the CET Agreement, the C-CI Treaty, the TPP, et al, and The WAD Accord
&
List of RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS,
see; davidehsmith.wordpress.com